Wired News: Sour Grapes Over Milk Labeling

This is a story from back in September last year on Wired News about Monsanto suing dairy producers who wish to advertise their milk as being free from the artificial growth hormones that are increasingly prevalent in the dairy industry. These growth hormones increase milk output by speeding up the metabolism of the cow, causing many health complications and necesitating an attendant heavy use of antibiotics.
Farmers who do not use the hormones are disadvantaged as their production per cow is lower, by up to 25%. The only economic advantage they have is the growing consumer awareness and preference for natural, ethical, environmentally friendly and non-genetically engineered products. So they want to label their milk as being free of these hormones. Monsanto officials say labels like “No rBST” or “rBST-free” are misleading, unfair and deceptive, and “unfairly hurt their business”.
I have been following Monsanto in this field for the past six or seven years, beginning when, as a reporter for a magazine in NZ, I interviewed a pair of journalists, Steve Wilson and Jane Akre, who had been fired by Fox Networks for producing a shocking expose on what was then called “Bovine Growth Hormone” or rBGH. The “rBST” mentioned in this article sounds exactly the same, and a quick google turned up this reference which confirms that in fact it is.
Let me tell you a few things about this hormone and the way that Monsanto have introduced it. The monopolistic manner in which they want to economically force all producers to adopt it or go out of business, and deny the public the right to know what they are buying and what goes into their food and to vote with their money, is simply the latest manifestation of what is basically an evil way of doing things.
Like I said in my summary of the Biotech conference last week, I think that a future in the hands of economic forces whose overriding concern is to maximise profits and “capture the market” is a very dangerous and potentially bleak one.
Drugs based on rBGH, or rBST as it is now known, are not approved in Australia or New Zealand. They were approved in the US by the FDA in record time in spite of research that showed that milk produced using rBGH increases the risk of cancer. This research was swept under the rug, but brought out by Steve and Jane during their investigation. Travelling north to Canada they had found that the drug regulation agency there had rejected the drug, and had been offered over a million dollars in “research grants” by Monsanto, which they had refused.
Steve and Jane’s report was envisioned by Fox producers as a special to extol the virtues of Monsanto’s new product. When it turned out completely the opposite they were first silenced and their documentary shelved, and then fired when after years of pressure they refused to change it to paint a positive picture of Monsanto and rBGH. Monsanto, through their various subsidiaries, are obviously a big contributor to the bottom line of Fox television and other entities in the Murdoch media empire through advertising revenue.
Fox muzzled them by invoking a confidentiality clause in their employment contract which stated that they were not allowed to talk about anything that they had learned while working for Fox. They circumvented this by launching an unfair dismissal complaint and then admitting everything relating to the documentary and their research as evidence, thereby placing it in the public domain and open to public scrutiny.
The right of the public to know and to choose what they support and what they don’t through their buying and consumption is fundamentally important. It is the present form of democracy where corporations buy the laws and the only real vote we have is how we spend our money.
Check out the information at this site for more indepth information on the effects of these hormones on milk.